Search Results

The Case For Organizing the Eight Systems of Election Integrity in Your County How The Left Plans To Seize Control of Our Local Election Offices The Federalist: Yes. Biden Is Hiding His Plan To Rig the 2022 Mid Term Election Wake County Election Director and State Board of Election Sued for Unconstitutional Retaliation Against Election Observer NC Board of Elections Launches Attack on Poll Observers NC State Board of Elections Blocks Use of Signature Verification on Absentee Ballots Judge Orders on Voter Assistance for Disabled Voters Felons Can Now Vote! Who the Hell is ERIC (and Why Is He In My NC State Budget?) Limiting the Damage to House Bill 103 from ERIC (Every legislator, R & D - in Raleigh voted for this monstrosity. The 4 Senators that didn't were absent. Action Alert issued before the Passage of NC Budget: Tyrannical Overreach in Session that Republicans Vote For. Don't Remain Silent! These are the Eight Systems that the Left has successfully infiltrated. WE have remained absent until now. A deafening silence. Virginia turned their state around in 2021 by organizing each county with eyes on every one of these systems. Will you answer the call for NC or remain silent? THIS IS HOW WE'RE FIGHTING BACK! •See what else is happening. Take Action! NCEIT Team Commentary on NCSBE Proposal for Temporary Rulemaking T Election Heroes Are Stopping Fraudulent Voting – Right Now! •Election Heroes Are Stopping Fraudulent Voting – The Postal Service Was In On It •Molly Hemingway from The Federalist and Cleta Mitchell talk about having free and fair election again and how it’s going to happen. Help Prevent Absentee Ballot Voter Abuse in Care Facilities •New Organization Trains Volunteers to Make Elections More Secure – NCEIT! •WhosCounting.us: Top Activists Across the Nation fighting back •NCEIT Director, Jim Womack, Tells What NC is doing to duplicate the 2021 VA Election Success. On WhosCounting.us

This is How The Left Hopes to Seize Control of Local Elections. The Left only has a 2-5% radicalized army of robot activist puppets run by an even smaller Marxist Democratic Socialist Cabal at the top. Their greatest weakness is the 95% of Americans who wake up and decide to start representing themselves and take back the nation! Are you one of the 95%? Learn how to take back our country. Join us at the The North Carolina Election Integrity Team Regional Summit in Asheville Date Saturday, August 20, 2022 Time 9:15AM – 3PM Location Woodfin Community Center 23 Community Rd. Woodfin, NC Buy Tickets Here $15 Deadline for ticket sales is Saturday, August 13th so you have lunch. Registration includes materials and lunch. Agenda: Poll Watcher Training. Task Forces/Work Groups. Our Reporting System. List Maintenance. Absentee Ballots, and more. We are building a permanent electoral infrastructure and duplicating the election success in Virginia in 2021. This is how we fix election fraud. See Citizens Guide to Building an Election Integrity Infrastructure: www.whoscounting.us Election Integrity Network – Who’s Counting with Cleta Mitchell Paid for by NCEIT.org and not any candidate or candidate's committee.

By Jay Delancey, Voter Integrity Project https://voterintegrityproject.com/sbe-tries-new-attack-on-poll-observer-rights/ July 18, 2022 (Raleigh) While many were enjoying extended early-July vacations, the NC State Board of Elections (NCSBE) was busily scheming, once again, to restrict the movement of poll observers and to make it easier for said observers to be kicked out of the voting location. The plan was announced by agency General Counsel, Katelyn Love (beginning at the 1:03:06 time stamp of this recorded meeting), whereby the agency would circumvent the normal approval process by making “temporary” rule changes (under NCGS §150B-21.1). Love freely admitted they were pushing the changes through the temporary rule making process because “the permanent rule making process is a fairly lengthy one… [that’s] too lengthy for the rules to be in place for the November election.” One rule change, affecting 08 NCAC 10B .0101, codifies agency policy to prohibit Election Day precinct officials from serving as volunteer poll observers during early voting. Love said the 10B changes are “to clarify and simplify” the observer-list submission process and she spent several minutes explaining the changes to the Board. The more onerous and capricious rule changes affect the poll observer conduct, as elaborated upon in 08 NCAC 20. 0101. For example, one revision would prohibit poll observers from “using doors designated for precinct officials or one-stop workers.” This burdensome change would require observers to enter and depart the voting enclosure by using the same entry point as the voters. Besides creating more opportunities to be deemed “disruptive” to the voting process, the rule would force observers through a lengthy maze of people standing in line and prevent the observer from documenting the relatively quick curbside voting procedure. The more egregious rule change involves a backhanded establishment of an illegal “area designated for observers,” which has been the holy grail for the more left-leaning election Directors for as long as I’ve been involved in election integrity, Wake Director, Gary Sims, chief among them. The “designated area” would be allowed, “provided the area designated allows the observer to observe each past of the voting process except for the marking of ballots.” The proposed rule makes no mention about whether or not the observer would be able to hear the conversations around the voting process. An example of this type abuse happened in Sanford, where Election Director Jane Rae Fawcett unsuccessfully designated a seat that would allow observers to “see” the entire early voting location without being able to hear any guidance a voter might be getting at the Help Desk or the Check-In Table. Both proposed rule changes are blatantly illegal because they fly in the face of the broad allowances NCGS §163-45(c) affords poll observers which even orders election officials to “permit the observer to make such observation and take such notes as the observer may desire.” (Click image to access the full poll observer statute.) https://www.ncleg.gov/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/PDF/BySection/Chapter_163/GS_163-45.pdf Another aspect of the SBE’s stealth law changes involves their possibly violating “the Purcell Rule,” which generally bars courts from changing election laws once the election cycle has begun. Central to this issue would be whether or not the Regulatory Rules Commission is considered a “court” proceeding. The public comment hearing on the rules will be at 10 a.m., July 28, in a virtual meeting. Details will follow as they become available. ###

"Several voter integrity teams, using advanced artificial intelligence technology, can check every registrant, at silicon speed, against over 30 databases, with a billion records, ensuring that the registrant is not living in an R.V. park, a church, or a UPS store, and that his address meets current legal standards. Sorry, Beto, but registering every itinerant is no longer the key to the Texas Governor's Mansion. For the first time, phantom voters are being identified before their registrations take effect." July 20th, 2022: Read Election Heroes Are Stopping Fraudulent Voting - And The Postal Service Was In On It The soul of phantom voter fraud is the occasional, non-committed voter. They show up at the last minute, delivering winning margins. Actually, nobody shows up. Nor does anyone return an absentee ballot. That magic comes from a wonderful customer service innovation, the Phantom Voter Concierge, who casts the non-committed voters’ votes for them. Let’s go there. Voter rolls are crammed with millions of voters who seldom, occasionally, or never vote. Democrat-leaning organizations run voter registration drives in edge communities, collecting identities they expect will never vote. You remember ACORN registering drug addicts on city streets? You might have said, “Why, they will never vote!” They aren’t expected to vote. They are simply voter identity placeholders later used by vote-harvesters. State-funded groups like ERIC are paid by a dozen state governments, some with clueless Republican governors, to make sure almost nobody is ever taken off voter rolls. ERIC provides institutional cover to this national phantom voter scam. During early voting, our vote-harvester pals track those who never voted or have not voted yet and vote for them. In some states, like Wisconsin, leftist groups had access to the online voter rolls — something nobody else had. They could track every voter and vote for all of them if they did not show up in 2020. Remember the stories in 2020 of people coming out to vote, often for the first time in years, to be told, “Sorry, you already voted”? Your Voter Concierge voted for you! Saved you the gas money to drive to the polls! There are people voting from Salvation Army Food Banks who registered at that address twelve years ago. Those people are likely dead or living in a tent in Austin now — but still voting. There are people at the Alabama college dorm, registered since 1984, still active and voting. In Wisconsin, the Voter Concierges went to cognitive care facilities, where the patients did not recognize their own children. Their Voter Concierge voted them. Now part of a criminal investigation, this is how it’s done. So how bad is the problem? The Wisconsin voter integrity team did a deep dive, using U.S. government and state databases, and found 225,000 active, current voters who had “issues.” Those included addresses that did not exist; locations that could not be a true registration address, like a jail; and scores of others. Elections are often decided by 1% of the vote. The Wisconsin team identified potential phantom voters easily able to impact an election. The other half of the scam is sending out absentee ballots to addresses that don’t line up. For instance, there may be an apartment building at 145 Essex Street. The ballot-harvesting industry registers people there, deliberately skipping their apartment number. Their mail gets returned to — you guessed it, smarty-pants! Those absentee ballots accumulate at the local Post Office. The Wisconsin voter integrity team, one of the best in the country, found evidence that the Post Office collected those ballots and gave them to the Voter Concierges — to vote. Pretty good USPS customer service! You might think this would be caught with signature matching. Right! That is why so many states or counties eliminated the signature match — like Maricopa County in Arizona. If your blood is boiling right now, you just don’t get it. This is customer service on a whole new level. The Voter Concierge gets votes counted – even if the voter never casts that vote. Voter integrity teams are now applying advanced computer technology to thwart the Voter Concierge by deep-cleaning the rolls. In 2022, the vote-harvesting industry will again flood the zone in swing counties with over 250,000 new registrants from September to November. Several voter integrity teams, using advanced artificial intelligence technology, can check every registrant, at silicon speed, against over 30 databases, with a billion records, ensuring that the registrant is not living in an R.V. park, a church, or a UPS store, and that his address meets current legal standards. Sorry, Beto, but registering every itinerant is no longer the key to the Texas Governor’s Mansion. For the first time, phantom voters are being identified before their registrations take effect. Living in an apartment where you do not designate the apartment number? Sorry, pal — you aren’t voting this year. Registering from a church? There had better be enough bathrooms to meet the certificate of occupancy requirements for that county. More voters showing up in a county than there are eligible citizens? Flagged hourly! Alert issued before the ballots are counted! As ballots arrive during early voting, artificial intelligence snapshots aggregate voter identities. That guy who voted on day 2 in person, disappeared on snapshot 8, reappeared on snapshot 11 with his ballot changed to absentee…is identified. Before that ballot is tabulated, it is red-flagged, and the voter integrity team files a protest. Thirty-five thousand inactive voters, changed to active — then voted, then changed to inactive again? The A.I. systems pick this up with snapshot analysis. That scam is over! For the first time, voter integrity teams have technology ballot-harvesters cannot outrun. When Sheriff Clarke and Mike Lindell started supporting these kinds of technologies, after the 2020 election, the focus was voter roll anomalies. Anomalies were abundant. The battlefield has changed to real-time analysis, driven by artificial intelligence. The combined knowledge of a dozen gifted voter integrity teams, with 16 months of experience, is built into an artificial intelligence engine, identifying phantom voters before they are registered, before they can illegally vote. Every time a fake vote is cast by a Voter Concierge, an American is disenfranchised. Artificial intelligence helps the good guys protect the vote and gives confidence to all Americans that their elections are legit. Voter integrity teams learned that chasing 2020 voter fraud after the election is too late. Some leading election integrity teams are stopping phantom voter fraud before it impacts elections. Cleaning up voter rolls just became an A.I.-driven, real time endeavor. Jay Valentine led the team that built the eBay fraud detection engine and the TSA No-Fly List. Jay’s website is JayValentine.com. He can be reached at Jay@ContingencySales.com.

https://thefederalist.com/2022/06/23/yes-biden-is-hiding-his-plan-to-rig-the-2022-midterm-elections/ When Biden ordered all 600 federal agencies to “expand citizens’ opportunities to register to vote and to obtain information about, and participate in, the electoral process” on March 7, 2021, Republican politicians, Constitutional scholars, and election integrity specialists began to worry exactly what was up his sleeve. Biden gave each agency 200 days to file their plans for approval. Mobilizing Voters Is Always a Political Act There are several major problems with Biden’s secret plan, critics say. It’s unethical to tie federal benefits to election activity. It’s unconstitutional to have the federal government take authority that belongs to the states and which Congress has not granted. And, given that all 50 states have different laws and processes governing election administration, it’s a recipe for chaos, confusion, and fraud at a time when election security concerns are particularly fraught. Choosing which groups to target for Get Out The Vote efforts is one of the most important activities done by political campaigns. Federal agencies that interact with the public by doling out benefits can easily pressure recipients to vote for particular candidates and positions. Congress passed the Hatch Act in 1939, which bans bureaucrats and bureaucracies from being involved in election activities after Democrats used Works Progress Administration programs and personnel for partisan political advantage. Executive Order 14019 ignores that the Constitution does not give the executive branch authority over elections. That power is reserved for the states, with a smaller role for Congress. With H.R. 1 and other Democrat Party efforts to grab more control over elections have thus far failed, Congress hasn’t authorized such an expansion. Leftist Groups Know Exactly What’s Going On Conservatives may be in the dark, but left-wing activist groups are fully involved in the plot. The left-wing dark money group Demos put out press releases immediately after the executive order was issued, saying it would be happy to work with federal agencies on the project. And then the group admitted publicly that it “organized agency-based working groups and met with the staff in these agencies to provide technical expertise as they developed their initial voter registration plans, to ensure those plans reflect the knowledge and priorities of various agency stakeholders.” It also admits it “developed research and resources to assist and advance agency efforts to implement robust voter registration opportunities, including a slide deck explainer of the agencies’ potential for impact, best practices for conducting voter registration at federal agencies, and recommendations for modernizing and improving the accessibility of Vote.gov.” What We Know While the White House and agencies are steadfastly refusing to share details about how they’re complying with the executive order, who they met with to develop their plans, or how they’re justifying their involvement in something Congress has not authorized them to participate in, some details are trickling out. Here are a few examples of the widespread and coordinated effort by Biden’s political appointees to meddle in the state administration of elections. The Department of Labor boasted that it was turning 2,300 American Job Centers previously focused on helping displaced workers find jobs into hubs of political activism. These new federally funded voter registration agencies were given guidance about how to bring in organizations to conduct “voter outreach.” The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services likewise announced plans to turn community health centers into voter registration agencies, using thousands of health care facilities to focus on voter registration and turnout. The Housing and Urban Development Department sent notice to public housing (disproportionately Democrat) authorities that they should begin voter registration drives and participation activities. The Department of Education sent letters to universities, telling them that Federal Work Study funds could now be used to support voter registration activities The U.S. Department of Agriculture said it’s using its child nutrition programs to push voter registration and enlisting state, local, and federally funded employees to implement voter registration drives in local schools. The Commerce Department produced a massive, 113-page report directs local voting board members about polling stations and poll worker training. The article The White House is refusing to share details about its coordinated efforts to engage in a federal takeover of election administration. Biden really does not want the public to know about his federal takeover of election administration. Dozens of members of Congress have repeatedly asked for details, to no avail. Good government groups, members of the media, and private citizens have filed requests under the Freedom of Information Act. Not a single one has been responded to. All signs indicate a concerted effort to keep the public in the dark until at least after the November midterm elections. The lack of transparency and responsiveness is so bad that the Department of Justice and some of its agencies have been repeatedly sued for the information. When President Biden ordered all 600 federal agencies to “expand citizens’ opportunities to register to vote and to obtain information about, and participate in, the electoral process” on March 7, 2021, Republican politicians, Constitutional scholars, and election integrity specialists began to worry exactly what was up his sleeve. They had good reason. The 2020 election had suffered from widespread and coordinated efforts by Democrat activists and donors to run “Get Out The Vote” operations from inside state and local government election offices, predominantly in the Democrat-leaning areas of swing states. Independent researchers have shown the effect of this takeover of government election offices was extremely partisan and favored Democrats overwhelmingly. At the time the order was issued, Democrats were also hoping to pass H.R. 1, a continuation of the effort to destabilize elections throughout the country via a federalized takeover of state election administrations. Biden gave each agency 200 days to file their plans for approval by none other than Susan Rice, his hyperpartisan domestic policy advisor. Yet fully nine months after those plans were due, they are all being hidden from the public, even as evidence is emerging that the election operation is in full swing. Mobilizing Voters Is Always A Political Act There are several major problems with Biden’s secret plan, critics say. It’s unethical to tie federal benefits to election activity. It’s unconstitutional to have the federal government take authority that belongs to the states and which Congress has not granted. And, given that all 50 states have different laws and processes governing election administration, it’s a recipe for chaos, confusion, and fraud at a time when election security concerns are particularly fraught. Mobilizing voters is always a political act. Choosing which groups to target for Get Out The Vote efforts is one of the most important activities done by political campaigns. Federal agencies that interact with the public by doling out benefits can easily pressure recipients to vote for particular candidates and positions. Congress passed the Hatch Act in 1939, which bans bureaucrats and bureaucracies from being involved in election activities after Democrats used Works Progress Administration programs and personnel for partisan political advantage. Executive Order 14019 ignores that the Constitution does not give the executive branch authority over elections. That power is reserved for the states, with a smaller role for Congress. With H.R. 1 and other Democrat Party efforts to grab more control over elections have thus far failed, Congress hasn’t authorized such an expansion. As with previous efforts to destabilize elections, the chaos and confusion that would occur are part of the plan. The Executive Order copied much of a white paper put out by left-wing dark money group Demos, which advocates for left-wing changes to the country and which brags on its website that it moves “bold progressive ideas from cutting-edge concept to practical reality.” Not coincidentally, Biden put former Demos President K. Sabeel Rahman and former Demos Legal Strategies Director Chiraag Bains in key White House posts to oversee election-related initiatives. Rahman serves as senior counsel at the White House office that oversees regulatory changes, meaning he approves every federal agency’s regulations and provides legal review of executive orders before they’re released. If you were looking to rush out constitutionally and ethically questionable orders, this post would be key to fill. Bains had been Demos’ director of legal strategies, helping write the paper that was turned into an executive order. He reports directly to Susan Rice, the hyperpartisan head of the Domestic Policy Council. Rice has served in political positions in Democrat White Houses and the scandal-ridden Brookings Institution. She played a role in the spying-on-Trump scandal, blatantly lying about the same, lying about the Benghazi terrorist attack, and lying about Bowe Bergdahl’s military record. Rice is described as President Obama’s “right-hand woman,” and it’s been said she was “like a sister” to the former president. She was his National Security Advisor at the same time Hunter Biden was hitching rides on official White House aircraft to other countries for meetings with oligarchs and corrupt government officials. She spread conspiracy theories about the law enforcement officers in Portland during the violent BLM riots that besieged the city. Most worrisome, she was briefed on the Clinton campaign’s Russia collusion hoax, which was used to destabilize the 2020 election and question its illegitimacy. Leftist Groups Know Exactly What’s Going On Conservatives may be in the dark, but left-wing activist groups are fully involved in the plot. The left-wing dark money group Demos put out press releases immediately after the executive order was issued, saying it would be happy to work with federal agencies on the project. And then the group admitted publicly that it “organized agency-based working groups and met with the staff in these agencies to provide technical expertise as they developed their initial voter registration plans, to ensure those plans reflect the knowledge and priorities of various agency stakeholders.” It also admits it “developed research and resources to assist and advance agency efforts to implement robust voter registration opportunities, including a slide deck explainer of the agencies’ potential for impact, best practices for conducting voter registration at federal agencies, and recommendations for modernizing and improving the accessibility of Vote.gov.” All of that information should be available to oversight authorities in Congress and the American taxpayers paying for its implementation, not just the left-wing groups that produced it. Yet as of this publication date, none of it has been shared. Biden’s plan “raises serious ethical, legal, and constitutional concerns,” wrote Rep. Ted Budd, R-N.C., along with three dozen Republican members of Congress on January 19, in a letter to the head of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), demanding more information by February 28 about the secret plot. It went unanswered. The top Republican members of nine House committees and subcommittees likewise demanded information from Rice and the head of OMB in a letter they sent on March 29. They noted that election activity goes well beyond “the scope of each agency’s authorizing statute and mission.” One of the concerns shared by the members was that Biden was directing agencies to work with third-party organizations. Nobody knows which third-party organizations have been approved by Rice for her political efforts, nor which are being used. They also asked how much money is being spent on the effort, which statutory authorities justify the election activities, and what steps are being taken to avoid Hatch Act violations. They received no response. The Foundation for Government Accountability filed a lawsuit on April 20th to compel the Department of Justice to respond to the FOIA request for information. And the American Accountability Foundation (AAF) filed suit on June 16 to compel Justice to comply. Those suits are ongoing. What We Know While the White House and agencies are steadfastly refusing to share details about how they’re complying with the executive order, who they met with to develop their plans, or how they’re justifying their involvement in something Congress has not authorized them to participate in, some details are trickling out. Here are a few examples of the widespread and coordinated effort by Biden’s political appointees to meddle in the state administration of elections. In the midst of a labor crisis, the Department of Labor boasted that it was turning 2,300 American Job Centers previously focused on helping displaced workers find jobs into hubs of political activism. These new federally funded voter registration agencies were given guidance about how to bring in organizations to conduct “voter outreach.” The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services likewise announced plans to turn community health centers into voter registration agencies, using thousands of health care facilities to focus on voter registration and turnout. The Housing and Urban Development Department sent notice to public housing authorities that they should begin voter registration drives and participation activities. Previously, officials had been barred from electoral activities because they receive federal funding. “It is presumed residents of public housing might disproportionately vote Democrat. … The executive order targets people receiving government benefits who might think their benefits depend on one party in power,” Stewart Whitson, legal director for the Foundation for Government Accountability, told the Daily Signal. The Department of Education sent “dear colleague” letters to universities, telling them that Federal Work Study funds could now be used to support voter registration activities, contrary to previous guidance. The change was made without having gone through any rulemaking process to allow the change. The U.S. Department of Agriculture said it’s using its child nutrition programs to push voter registration and enlisting state, local, and federally funded employees to implement voter registration drives in local schools. The Commerce Department produced a massive, 113-page report which likely took four agency officials many hours to generate. It directs local voting board members about polling stations and poll worker training. The tactics being used by these agencies were almost certainly contained in the plans submitted to Rice that have been withheld from investigators and overseers who had hoped to have some transparency about what the plans were. Frequently, the agencies claim the tactics are in response to the executive order, yet information about how they were developed has been withheld from the public for much of the year. It is unclear why Biden and his political appointees are being so secretive about the work that went into their plan to engage in a federal takeover of election administration. Whatever the case, Americans have a right to know whether these bureaucracies that are meddling in elections have experts in for each state’s election laws, what type of training is going on to ensure that state laws are being followed, whether they are allowing inspections and oversight to ensure no illegal activity, how they are determining whether a third-party group is genuinely non-partisan, whether they are allowing state investigators to approve money, and how much is being spent on this federal takeover of elections. Mollie Ziegler Hemingway is the Editor-in-Chief of The Federalist. She is Senior Journalism Fellow at Hillsdale College. A Fox News contributor, she is a regular member of the Fox News All-Stars panel on “Special Report with Bret Baier.” Her work has appeared in the Wall Street Journal, USA Today, the Los Angeles Times, the Guardian, the Washington Post, CNN, National Review, GetReligion, Ricochet, Christianity Today, Federal Times, Radio & Records, and many other publications. Mollie was a 2004 recipient of a Robert Novak Journalism Fellowship at The Fund for American Studies and a 2014 Lincoln Fellow of the Claremont Institute. She is the co-author of Justice on Trial: The Kavanaugh Confirmation and the Future of the Supreme Court. She is the author of "Rigged: How the Media, Big Tech, and the Democrats Seized Our Elections." Reach her at mzhemingway@thefederalist.com

https://townhall.com/columnists/kevinmccullough/2022/07/03/why-the-left-truly-is-evil-not-stupid-n2609704?utm_source=thdailypm&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&bcid=30b980e41fe11fe84d8a9d4713c006bd6f20717841089ad50acb987f451f14e4&recip=21710228

July 14, 2022 "As noted by N.C. Attorney General Josh Stein in 2018, "[...] the bulk of voter fraud occurs absentee, and there's nothing to do with ensuring that the person voting absentee is who they say they are." By specifically prohibiting signature-match verification on absentee ballots, the State Board has neutered the County Boards of Elections ability to mitigate potential fraud where the risk of fraud is highest. The People of North Carolina deserve far better." Read press release here: https://www.nc.gop/ncsbe_signature_ruling So, what's wrong with this picture? The NC General Assembly creates election law, not the NC State Board of Elections or the judiciary. NCGOP Chair Michael Whatley: "We are stunned that the Democrats on the State Board of Elections are blocking the use of signature verification on absentee ballots," said Chairman of the N.C. Republican Party Michael Whatley. "This misguided decision is a direct contradiction of state law, which is clear that County Boards of Elections are required to validate the identity of absentee voters. The North Carolina Republican Party will explore every option at our disposal to restore voter signature verification as an essential component of our County Boards' efforts to protect the integrity of North Carolina elections.” So where is the legislature? Make this an election issue. Ask you reps or candidates about this issue when they come to see you to ask for your vote and support.

The elections administrative code for NC is very, very hard to find. If a private company selling goods made it this difficult to find products, they'd be out of business before they started! The government is pretty useless. The BOE doesn't want you to find The Administrative Code on their website so they buried it under pages and pages. Hmmm! At a Board of Elections meeting in Henderson County, our group asked for the Administration Code for the chain of custody for seals on the absentee ballots. They refused us and they refused a Board of Election Member. Really! What are they hiding? Enjoy! Be armed with the facts. Just follow the steps below: In your search engine, type in https://www.ncsbe.gov/ Click on About Elections on the right side of the page. Click on the Box labeled, Legal Resources; https://www.ncsbe.gov/about-elections/legal-resources On the right side of the page, click on Election Law Index: https://www.ncsbe.gov/about-elections/legal-resources Click on NC Administrative Code Title 8 (bottom of the list) http://reports.oah.state.nc.us/ncac.asp?folderName=%5CTitle%2008%20-%20Elections On the upper left of the page, you will see NCAC > Title 08 - Elections. The page lists 21 chapters of administrative code on elections. Type in Election Observers in the upper search bar or scroll down the page to Chapter 20. Also, take a look at all of the Chapters. There is information to help you with the Eight Systems of Election Integrity. Be armed with the facts when you Observe, go to the Board of Elections, join a MAT team, or go to the post office about absentee ballots, or question voting equipment, etc. Get organized in your county on the Eight Systems of Election Integrity. Put Eyes Everywhere. Shine the Light so they can't cheat! This was we never have another 2020 again. Citizens Guide To Building an Election Integrity Infrastructure by Cleta Mitchell https://www.nceit.org/_files/ugd/71310c_f06a43795f68464c99002c03bbfda79d.pdf

Act for America is one of our NCEIT partners. https://www.actforamerica.org/ The Left is heavily investing in local politics! They have over 160 million dollars ready for deployment towards MEGA PROGRESSIVE candidates this Fall and 2024 General Election. We have seen the destructive and dangerous results of Soros funded District Attorney’s. · Soros backed groups have spent over $40 million to elect progressives in the past decade. · Today 1 in 5 Americans live in a Soros criminal justice system · Soros owns HALF of America’s largest jurisdictions We have seen the destructive results of Zuckerbucks flooding battleground states and county election systems, installing unsecured drop boxes which allowed unprecedented ballot harvesting and trafficking, and significantly impacted the outcomes of elections by as much as 30%. We have seen the destructive results of rogue School Boards, City Mayors, and City Council infecting our cities and our children with outrageous controls, spending, propaganda, and indoctrination. From cradle to grave, the Left is steeped in understanding of how transformation of a nation happens at the local government level. And they invest their money and time into local grassroots to impact elections and policy! Now their eyes are focused on securing Election Clerks! The Left is working very hard to run and elect mega progressive political activists in local district seats. Election Clerks hold a lot of discretionary decision-making power that absolutely impacts outcomes of elections! Nationally, only 15%-27% of registered voters bother to vote in local elections for Mayor, City Council, Sheriff, District Attorney’s, School Board, and yes, Election Clerks! For the Left, this means no contest because the Left runs for these local seats and their local grassroots army elects them with as little as 40 votes or a few hundred dollars in some cities!! Those who simply want to vote and be left alone will always lose against those who want to rule AND if we don’t engage, we will NEVER be left alone! The Left only has a 2-5% radicalized army of robot activist puppets run by an even smaller Marxist Democratic Socialist Cabal at the top. Their greatest weakness is the 95% of Americans who wake up and decide to start representing themselves and take back the nation! It’s not expensive or difficult for grassroots patriots to overcome this Mega Progressive, Soros/Zuckerbuck 3-talking-point robot activist army! Our Winning Grassroots Strategy 1) Chapters and Volunteer Teams in Every County 2) ACT in FAITH Chapters in Every Church and State 3) ACT for America Statewide Mobilization Network 4) Growing Grassroots Keyboard and Phone Activists 5) Overcoming Mega Progressive Local Efforts Shaping Policy and Holding Officials Accountable Imagine a tsunami of conservatives washing over the Media, the Fed, our States, and the Leftwing Cabal, until their voice and views become silenced by the roar of conservatives that render them irrelevant! We are the firewall of defense! We are the line that won’t be crossed! We will turn the tide on the ‘Woke and Broke Agenda’ that is destroying our nation and our future! Support Us | Join the Movement | Receive Email Alerts

https://www.dailysignal.com/2022/07/18/how-the-left-hopes-to-use-big-money-to-seize-control-of-local-election-offices/?utm_source=TDS_Email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Top5&mkt_tok=ODI0LU1IVC0zMDQAAAGFxW5XHtE5_OUD4cEsjeMVe_UyaRkPG_0Uf-ceuhembjfW2AAFgYwpSpY3LFf5d5P2g5fl0BkR3KcVkC76Lm-4Wi2y3XOOilo2nRKvoAHc9A0LOahw Two big money liberal operations, ready to spend $80 million each, are trying to determine who controls elections and how in the years ahead. “The overall objective of the political left is to change the way you conduct overall elections,” Jason Snead, executive director of the Honest Elections Project, which advocates clean elections, told The Daily Signal. One of the two liberal groups, Run for Something, is a political action committee founded by a former Hillary Clinton campaign staffer. In the spring, Run for Something established its Clerk Work project with the goal of electing clerks, election supervisors, registrars, recorders, and other local officials charged with running elections. The PAC says it will promote thousands of election administrators in the years ahead. But for 2022, it reports endorsing 11 candidates competing in races in California, Colorado, Illinois, Missouri, Nevada, North Carolina, and Tennessee. Local election clerks generally are empowered to interpret and enforce state election regulations. They often have discretion on matters such as whether to count absentee ballots that come in after Election Day, how strictly to enforce voter ID or signature-matching requirements, and how closely poll watchers may monitor the ballot counting on Election Day. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, county-level election officials are elected in 22 states. In 10 states, elected officials appoint members to a local board of elections. Another 18 states divide election administration duties between two or more offices. In any case, donating to specific candidates to oversee elections could directly or indirectly affect who holds these positions. Some practices of local election administrators also could be guided by another $80 million effort by the U.S. Alliance for Election Excellence, a coalition of mostly left-leaning organizations financed in part by Big Tech executives to train local officials in running elections. Snead and other critics say they see parallels between Run for Something and efforts to elect liberal prosecutors financed by liberal hedge fund manager George Soros. They also see strong similarities between the U.S. Alliance for Election Excellence and Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s election administration grants in the 2020 election cycle. “What we shouldn’t lose track of is they are playing the long game,” Snead said. “They are going to look for every possible way to impact elections, and they can make substantial changes in the long run through this kind of program that they wouldn’t have been able to make in 2020.” The Alliance for Election Excellence is not formally aligned with Run for Something’s Clerk Work project. However, the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (created by Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan) has donated to Run for Something. “I would not be surprised if someone gets elected with the support of Run for Something and then immediately plugs themselves into the [Alliance for Election Excellence], because there are those natural synergies,” Snead said. Election Clerk Controversies The Clerk Work project is new this year, but politicization of election officials has been a growing controversy for years. Last month in Philadelphia, a former Democrat congressman, Michael “Ozzie” Myers, pleaded guilty in federal court of bribing the city’s election officials to stuff ballot boxes in local races. In 2012, Kathy Nickolaus, a Republican county clerk in Waukesha County, Wisconsin, agreed to step down after saying that “human error” led to the late discovery of 14,000 uncounted votes in a contested election. In 2019, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, a Republican, removed Broward County Supervisor of Elections Brenda Snipes, a Democrat, who admitted in a 2017 lawsuit that the county had more registered voters than eligible voters, and that noncitizens and ineligible felons may have voted in past elections. A Florida judge ruled in 2018 that Snipes violated the law when she destroyed ballots from a Democrat congressional primary in August 2016. Her office once posted the results of an election 30 minutes before polls closed. In 2012, Donald Whitten, a Democrat who was county clerk in Lincoln County, West Virginia, pleaded guilty to stuffing ballot boxes and falsifying absentee ballots in 2010. A national project aimed at electing partisans to election supervisory positions poses threats to clean and honest elections, said Hans von Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation, parent organization of The Daily Signal. “It is a very dangerous development for local election officials, who were supposed to be objective and nonpartisan,” von Spakovsky said. “This group is trying to elect political consultants and political activists to these positions, with the potential for meddling with the election results and further undermining confidence in elections,” he said of Run for Something. Soros Prosecutors Provide Model Run for Something’s $80 million Clerk Work project, which began in April, is set to span three years and encompass 35 states. The project closely resembles one by Soros, a Hungarian-American billionaire, to elect district attorneys across the country who would take a progressive approach to prosecutions, Snead said. But in this case, it’s a national effort to elect left-leaning election officials, he said. Soros was the primary funder behind Justice and Public Safety, the super PAC that gave big donations to the campaigns of liberal candidates for district attorney. “What we are seeing is the same sort of strategy being directed toward election officials,” Snead told The Daily Signal, referring to activists on the left. “They are trying very much to repeat that strategy and the successes that they’ve seen in these local election officials, and the consequences could be significant.” In the case of electing prosecutors who would be softer on criminals, Soros fueled national campaign resources into what had previously been low-dollar, down-ballot local campaigns. The effort to put sympathetic elections officials in place could be similar, Snead said. “A lot of these positions are very, very down-ballot races. They can be won or lost—in terms of campaign spending—at the cost of buying a box of doughnuts,” he said. “The idea that you have an organization coming in like Run for Something, bringing national resources to these races, it could be a substantial impact on the race itself.” ‘Influence … Who is Administering Elections’ In 2017, former Hillary Clinton campaign aide Amanda Litman founded Run for Something as a 527 political action committee aimed at winning down-ballot races, endorsing candidates, and helping to fund their campaigns. Run for Something did not respond to numerous inquiries from The Daily Signal about this report. Litman, however, recently told The Washington Post, “You can influence quite literally who is administering elections,” and added: “If we don’t do it, we are absolutely going to regret it.” The organization’s Clerk Work project specifically aims to elect liberal election workers. In April, Litman tweeted that Clerk Work will be “supporting 5,000+ candidates for local offices in charge of election administration,” the website of the Alliance for Election Excellence says. Amanda Litman @amandalitman· Follow Today @runforsomething is announcing Clerk Work, our $80 million 3-year plan to save democracy from the ground up by recruiting & supporting 5,000+ candidates for local offices in charge of election administration. @ec_schneider has the details: politico.com Fighting Trump, Dems launch plan to elect thousands of local election supervisors The $80 million effort comes as Trump-friendly conspiracy ... However, Run for Something’s candidates page lists only 11 candidates running in 2022 for offices such as county clerk, county registrar, and county recorder—all with supervisory roles over local elections. Run for Something notes that Steve Bannon, a former campaign and White House adviser to Donald Trump, said in December 2021: We are going to take over the election apparatus. American citizens that are volunteering. … They are going to volunteer to become a precinct committeeman. They are going to volunteer to become an election official. They are going to come and run for county clerk and overthrow those [incumbent] county clerks. In a December 2021 tweet, Run for Something said of the former Trump aide: “Steve Bannon is recruiting people to run for local election administrator. So are we.” However, recruiting registered Democrats or Republicans as poll workers and poll watchers is different than a well-financed effort to place party activists in election supervisory posts, said Snead, head of the Honest Elections Project. One of Run for Something’s largest donors is LinkedIn’s political arm, which gave $250,000 in the 2018 election cycle, the most recent listed by the Center for Responsive Politics, which monitors political donations. The 501(c)(4) group Onward Together, founded in 2017 by Hillary Clinton, gave $100,000 to Run for Something. Act Blue, a PAC devoted to electing Democrats nationally, gave $50,000. The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative contributed $10,000. Election Excellence The Alliance for Election Excellence is a five-year, $80 million project made up of seven nonprofit organizations aimed at advising local election offices on how to run elections in their jurisdictions. The Center for Tech and Civic Life is the leading organization among seven in the alliance. In 2020, the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative gave $350 million to the Center for Tech and Civic Life, a left-leaning group that distributed grants to mostly Democrat-dominated precincts, driving up the vote. The Zuckerbergs’ grants, dubbed Zuckerbucks, helped finance drop boxes and expanded mail-in balloting, among other activities. Although the Alliance for Election Excellence is not specific about what recommendations it will promote, critics such as Snead suspect it will be suggestions that tend to help Democrats, such as expanding mail-in voting. Other groups in the alliance include the Center for Secure and Modern Elections, a project of the New Venture Fund, itself sponsored by the liberal dark money group Arabella Advisors. Arabella Advisors sponsors several left-leaning organizations, some of which are pop-up organizations that exist for the duration of an election cycle while others spin off to become independent nonprofits. The alliance’s “training” is a loophole to avoid bans on private funding of election administration in 21 states, Snead said. No one should assume this $80 million project would be less effective than the $400 million Zuckerberg project in 2020, he said. That funding was skewed heavily toward expanding mail-in voting and providing ballot drop boxes, and critics say this could have amounted to a get-out-the-vote effort that helped Democrats. “If you assume that 2020 was a learning opportunity at the very least, then certainly they could come back with potentially more effective programs the second go-around,” Snead said. In addition to the Center for Tech and Civic Life and the Center for Secure and Modern Elections, the alliance includes: —The Center for Civic Design, an election-administration policy organization that frequently partners with left-of-center organizations. —The Arabella-sponsored Center for Secure and Modern Elections, which advocates for automatic voter registration. —The Hasso Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford, part of the university’s school of engineering. —The Elections Group, a consulting organization that works with election officials and was established in 2020 to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. —The Prototyping Systems Lab at University of California, Davis, which focuses on designing technology. —U.S. Digital Response, which started during the pandemic to help with state and local governments’ digital needs. The Alliance for Election Excellence is inviting cities, counties, and other local election jurisdictions to apply for training to become “centers for excellence.” Its website says: As part of the alliance, centers will receive training, mentorship, and resources, and serve as a support system for each other and election departments across the country. … Local election officials are the expert on what their voters need, and the alliance will work with each center to fill in the gaps. This could look like redesigning a form so it’s more likely a voter will successfully complete it or updating an election website so it is mobile-friendly and answers voters’ top questions. Given the political ties of the organizations running the alliance, Heritage’s von Spakovsky said, he is skeptical that the organization is trying to train election officials in best practices. “‘Best practices’ is a thin disguise necessary for doing what these organizations wanted to see done under the HR 1 federal bill, which was legislation that would have made fair and honest elections nearly impossible in the future,” von Spakovsky said. The former Federal Election Commission member was referring to HR 1, dubbed the “For the People Act,” legislation from congressional Democrats that passed the House last year but died in the Senate. The bill would have nationalized local or state election procedures by banning voter ID laws in most states, expanding the controversial practice of ballot harvesting, and mandating that every state allow Election Day voter registration. Have an opinion about this article? To sound off, please email letters@DailySignal.com and we’ll consider publishing your edited remarks in our regular “We Hear You” feature. Remember to include the url or headline of the article plus your name and town and/or state. Want to keep up with the 24/7 news cycle? Want to know the most important stories of the day for conservatives? Need news you can trust? Subscribe to The Daily Signal’s email newsletter. Learn more >> @FredLucasWH Fred Lucas Fred Lucas is chief news correspondent and manager of the Investigative Reporting Project for The Daily Signal. Lucas is also the author of "Abuse of Power: Inside The Three-Year Campaign to Impeach Donald Trump." Send an email to Fred.

Tucker Carlson: Nothing like this has ever happened Video: What the 1965 Immigration Law has done to US.

See link https://ago.mo.gov/home/news/2022/07/13/missouri-attorney-general-condemns-fbi-s-illegal-attempts-to-harvest-concealed-carry-permit-information-from-missouri-sheriffs The FBI is out of control under this illegitimate regime. This is how we fight back. We cannot let these Marxists in DC trample all over our inalienable rights. One of the Systems of Election Integrity is Statutory Provisions & Compliance where WE provide legislative oversignt and advocacy. Join the army of an established, trusted, statewide infrastructure, comprised of a network of regional and county Eection Integrity Task forces with operators who are trained, certified and geographically positinal to ensure secire ad legitimate election processes for November 22 and beyond. Visit NCEIT.org at Join Us. Come to the WNC Regional Summit on August 20th, 2022 in Buncombe County to get trained and equipped to stop the Left.