Another worthy article from Natalie Winters. Here she documents a significant vector for foreign money influencing US elections. As this particular effort is currently targeting 2026 congressional seats. Documents reviewed exclusively by this publication reveal an elaborate foreign effort to raise millions of dollars for a targeted voter-mobilization operation capable of “chang[ing] the outcomes of national elections” in the United States. The previously unreported records show that Power for Democracies, a Berlin-based organization, has built a detailed system for evaluating which American nonprofits can most efficiently convert donor money into voter registrations, turnout and political power. After examining more than 100 civil-society organizations, it selected Freedom2Vote as one of the most effective vehicles for influencing the 2026 midterm elections. This Substack is reader-supported. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Upgrade to paid Power for Democracies is now steering both American and foreign donors toward the organization, which is seeking approximately $19 million to target potential voters across as many as 14 decisive states. Its own evaluation projects that the fully funded operation would register more than 350,000 Americans and generate over 200,000 additional votes in “pivotal House and Senate races.” The operation is not merely aimed at encouraging generic civic participation. Power for Democracies explicitly presents Freedom2Vote as a way to check what it calls “authoritarianism” under President Donald Trump, shift control of Congress during the 2026 midterms and create a newly registered voter base that can be mobilized again in the 2028 presidential election. Share The foreign fundraising pitch contains the smoking-gun admission: “A non-partisan organisation under US tax law, Freedom2Vote maintains neutral language and content in its outreach to ensure compliance. It can receive funds from both US and foreign donors.” But Freedom2Vote’s operation is built with Civitech, an explicitly partisan Democratic political-technology firm led by a former Hillary Clinton campaign official.

Afederal judge in Florida on Tuesday ordered the Department of Homeland Security to restore some of the key features of its Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements system, which states use to verify citizenship and immigration status for voter rolls. The ruling overturns a D.C. judge's ruling, who determined that the SAVE system's features, including a feature that allowed workers to verify citizenship status through a resident's social security number, violated the Social Security Act and Privacy Act by improperly aggregating and using Americans’ personal data. The SAVE system was enhanced under the Trump administration to better support state election integrity efforts, including maintenance of state voter rolls. U.S. District Judge T. Kent Wetherell II ruled that the DHS violated a settlement with states, including Florida, by disabling the features. Wetherell approved the settlement last year and has maintained jurisdiction to enforce the settlement. "Defendants are plainly in violation of the settlement agreement because it is undisputed that they disabled the bulk-upload and SSN-search features that the agreement expressly required the SAVE system to have," he wrote in the order. "The fact that defendants disabled those features to comply with [the judge's] order does not change the fact that they violated the agreement." Wetherell determined that the features did not violate federal law, concluding the SSN-search functions align with 8 U.S.C. §1373, which overrides other restrictions on sharing citizenship or immigration status information, according to Florida's Voice News. The judge ordered defendants to file a status report on its compliance with the latest order by July 14. Misty Severi is a news reporter for Just The News. You can follow her on X for more coverage.

BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP CRISIS, 2020 ELECTION BOMBSHELLS EXPOSED | JUNE 30, 2026 Please watch this interview: https://americasvoice.news/video/dpib9lFczK7ZZ9ri/?related=playlist Find out more at https://www.godsfivestones.com/ https://www.veteranaction.org/ https://thedrilldown.com/

The Supreme Court has delivered a major victory for American sovereignty, ruling that the Trump Administration has full authority to terminate Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haitian migrants. The Biden Administration weaponized TPS as a backdoor amnesty to flood the country with millions of unvetted migrants — and that loophole is finally closed. This is the latest decisive win in President Donald J. Trump’s relentless effort to end the border invasion and put American citizens first. Here are 60 key actions the Trump Administration has taken as part of its historic America First border agenda: The Supreme Court affirmed the Trump Administration’s authority to remove green card holders who threaten American communities. The Supreme Court upheld the Trump Administration’s policy to swiftly turn back illegal aliens seeking asylum before they set foot on U.S. soil. The Supreme Court affirmed the Trump Administration’s full discretion over Temporary Protected Status designations and terminations. The Supreme Court allowed the Trump Administration’s Safe Third Country deportation program to continue. A federal appeals court affirmed the Trump Administration’s expedited removal policy, accelerating deportations of illegal aliens. The Trump Administration reformed the citizenship test to better assess aliens’ understandings of American history, government, and values, and better ensure aliens meet all eligibility requirements. The Trump Administration dramatically expanded the immigration enforcement workforce, including more than doubling the number of ICE agents. The Trump Administration restored the practice of conducting neighborhood investigations of potential new citizens to verify their claims and ensure we get a full picture of their character. The Trump Administration dramatically accelerated immigration court hearings. The Trump Administration restricted access to immigrant work permits, prioritizing U.S. workers and tightening security. The Trump Administration moved to raise naturalization fees so American taxpayers are no longer subsidizing the process. The Trump Administration moved to secure our financial system against illegal aliens. The Trump Administration ended government-backed mortgage financing for illegal aliens and H-1B visa holders. The Trump Administration immediately suspended refugee resettlement and dramatically reduced the number of refugees admitted. The Trump Administration banned foreign nationals — including green card holders — from accessing Small Business Administration loans intended for American entrepreneurs. The Trump Administration banned illegal aliens from more than a dozen taxpayer-funded healthcare programs. The Trump Administration implemented strict English proficiency and residency requirements for commercial driver’s license holders. The Trump Administration accelerated deportation flights to record highs. The Trump Administration moved to implement a new remittance tax on money sent out of the country by illegal aliens. The Trump Administration launched an aggressive crackdown on asylum fraud. The Trump Administration welcomed the largest-ever class of new immigration judges. The Trump Administration declared a national border emergency on Day One. The Trump Administration deployed thousands of military personnel to the southern border to support enforcement. The Trump Administration resumed construction of the border wall to defend the homeland. The Trump Administration reinstated the successful Remain in Mexico policy. The Trump Administration established Safe Third Country agreements to expedite deportations. The Trump Administration ended dangerous “catch-and-release” policies, delivering 13 straight months of zero releases at the border. The Trump Administration repurposed the failed Biden-era CBP One app into a self-deportation tool. The Trump Administration paused visa processing for 75 high-risk countries. The Trump Administration launched an unprecedented denaturalization effort targeting those who fraudulently obtained U.S. citizenship. President Trump signed the Laken Riley Act into law, requiring detention of illegal aliens charged with serious crimes. The Trump Administration restricted entry of H-1B aliens unless their petition is accompanied by a $100,000 payment. The Trump Administration dramatically expanded federal immigration detention capacity, including the largest migrant detention facility in U.S. history. The Trump Administration announced a new policy generally requiring aliens in the U.S. temporarily to return to their home countries to apply for a green card. The Trump Administration moved to protect American workers by ending employers’ ability to pay substandard wages to foreign workers in certain visa programs. The Trump Administration ended the practice of granting automatic extensions of employment authorization documents for aliens. The Trump Administration ended the random selection process for H-1B registrations. The Trump Administration tightened visa interview waiver categories, requiring most applicants to attend in-person interviews. The Trump Administration implemented a new visa integrity fee to all visitors applying to enter on nonimmigrant visas, as well as several other new fees — all designed to enhance the integrity of the visa application and deter overstays. The Trump Administration moved to establish a fixed time period of the completion of their program or four years (whichever is shorter) for foreign students and exchange visitor visa categories. The Trump Administration moved to significantly expand the data schools are required to provide on students studying in the U.S., including information on programs of study, funding sources, graduation dates, and more. The Trump Administration moved to prohibit using federal assistance and grant funding to provide services to illegal aliens. The Trump Administration commenced data sharing programs on illegal aliens receiving taxpayer-funded health insurance benefits. The Trump Administration implemented bonds of up to $15,000 for visa applications from citizens of high-risk countries. The Trump Administration blocked illegal aliens from accessing federal funds for higher education programming. The Trump Administration moved to bar illegal aliens from abusing refundable individual income tax credit benefits. The Trump Administration moved to purge tens of thousands of illegal aliens from states’ voter rolls. The Trump Administration enhanced the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) program to ensure noncitizens cannot vote in U.S. elections. The Trump Administration implemented a new visa restriction policy for family members and associates of individuals sanctioned over ties to fentanyl trafficking. The Trump Administration launched a stipend program to incentivize self-deportation and reduce costs. The Trump Administration launched a fine program to incentivize illegal aliens to self-deport. The Trump Administration moved to strip federal funding from sanctuary jurisdictions. The Trump Administration upgraded the human trafficking hotline. The Trump Administration terminated so-called “sanctuary” policies in Washington, D.C. The Trump Administration invoked the Alien Enemies Act to deport illegal alien gang members. The Trump Administration launched major immigration enforcement operations in cities around the country, including Operation Metro Surge, Midway Blitz, and Catahoula Crunch. President Trump signed the Secure America Act into law, delivering $70 billion in vital homeland security funding for ICE and CBP. The Trump Administration secured new partnerships with local law enforcement to facilitate crackdowns on illegal immigration. The Trump Administration revoked thousands of visas from foreign students for crimes and support for terrorism. The Trump Administration re-launched the Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement Office to assist Americans harmed by immigrant crime. These actions are only part of the largest and most aggressive immigration enforcement effort in American history — and more are on the way. President Trump will never stop putting the interests of the American people first. Related 365 WINS IN 365 DAYS: President Trump’s Return Marks New Era of Success, Prosperity Releases January 20, 2026 Week 13 Wins: President Trump’s Relentless Pursuit of Prosperity, Opportunity Releases April 18, 2025 President Trump Is Securing Our Homeland: Ending the Invasion, Deporting Criminals, and Protecting Our Communities Releases February 24, 2026 H-1B FAQ Releases September 21, 2025 “A BIG WIN”: Supreme Court Ends Excessive Nationwide Injunctions Releases June 27, 2025 123…80 Next Page

House Bill H958 that is sponsored by Republicans Blackwell; Stevens (Primary) Blust; Dixon; Kidwell; Penny; Pike; Ward was drafted in April of 2025. The North Carolina Election Integrity Team (NCEIT.org) has been diligently working with the House Elections Law Committee to fix fatal flaws in the bill (which are still there but worse). The House Election Law Committee passed the bill out of Committee a few days ago and sent it to be scheduled for a floor vote on Tuesday, June 30th with the egregious changes to H958. This debacle that they have cooked up looks like a Leftist dream to turn NC into NY and CA. If passed by the House, it will go to the NC Senate where we will have another chance to fix the bill. In the meantime, PLEASE call NC Republican Chair and Vice Chairs of the Rules Committee and Election Law Committee and leave a message. You can follow up with an email. FIX H958! Want to preserve our nation and our state, it starts in NC with our representatives representing WE THE PEOPLE. Thank you so very much for taking the time to participate. Please call House Rules before Tuesday, June 30th: Also, call your representatives. Chair: Rep John R. Bell (R) 919-715-3017. John.Bell@ncleg.gov Vice Chairs: Rep Tricia Ann Cotham (R) 919-733-5886. Tricia.Cotham@ncleg.gov Rep Brenden H. Jones (R) 919-733-5821. Brenden.Jones@ncleg.gov Rep Erin Pare (R) 919-733-2962. Erin.Pare@ncleg.gov Please call House Election Law Committee before Tuesday, June 30th. Also, call your representatives. Chair: NC Rep Hugh Blackwell (R) 919-733-5805. Hugh.Blackwell@ncleg.gov Vice Chair: Rep Ted Davis, Jr. (R) 919-733-5786. Ted.Davis@ncleg.gov Please try to rephrase the talking points into your own words so the comments are not counted as one. Thank you. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dear Representative: H958 Election Law Changes is poised to negatively alter our NC elections unless you address these unacceptable provisions as follows: Grants poll judges and building proprietors ARREST power! This is total overreach and abuse of power. This will directly and negatively impact electioneering workers and poll observers. Only law enforcement officers have this power. Worse, this provision is a violation of our civil rights (arrest without a warrant). Judges should call law enforcement if and when laws are broken. The reasons listed for “arrest“ are too subjective for non-law enforcement to make adequate determinations. Law fare is inevitable. DISORDERLY CONDUCT AT VOTING PLACE. SECTION 2.3.(a) "§ 14-132. (b) Any person in charge of any public building or facility owned or controlled by the State, any subdivision of the State, or any other public agency shall have authority to arrest summarily and without warrant for a violation of this section. Allows foreign money to influence our elections. pg 29 lines 1-7 No foreign money Donations should be accepted in North Carolina. SECTION 5.3.(a) CONTRIBUTIONS BY FOREIGN NATIONALS needs to be deleted. The way this reads: American citizens working for foreign national organizations can contribute. Their foreign employers contribute surreptitiously. Not acceptable! Removes the ban on Rank Choice Voting that was banned in the previous Proposed Committee Substitute (PCS). Why was it taken out!! This is the same style of voting in CA and NY and other states who have turned bright blue. How's that working out? Instead of one person one vote, voters get multiple votes in the same race. It is unconstitutional and it is a direct attack on the electoral college. The Commies want the electoral college eliminated. This way a handful of cities across the US will decide our federal elections. All you need to do is look at what happened in CA with the Los Angeles mayoral race to see how Rank Choice Voting works at the local level. Removes prior section 2.14 in the 7/31/25 PCS which requires the Department of Transportation (DOT) to provide social security information to the State Board of Elections. This should be put back in. We need voter verification of identity. The SS info does this. Did we not pass an Amendment for Voter ID? It's worthless unless we verify the identity of the voter. It is frankly incredulous that Republicans would allow these provisions to stand, be voted favorably and then moved to the floor for a vote. Please do not turn us into a blue state! As we approach the celebration of our 250th Anniversary of our great nation, we look forward to preserving it in perpetuity. With election law changes such as these, the dreams of North Carolinians are jeopardized as well as the future of our posterity. Won't you please restore our election laws to mirror the principles in our Founding documents? Sincerely, Your name Your Address Your phone

Senate Elections Committee https://www.ncleg.gov/Committees/CommitteeInfo/SenateStanding/154 Chair: Senator Warren Daniel: (919) 715-7823 Email: Warren.Daniel@ncleg.gov Chair: Senator Ralph Hise: (919) 733-3460 Email: Ralph.Hise@ncleg.gov Chair: Senator Brad Overcash: (919) 733-5734 Email: Brad.Overcash@ncleg.gov Senator W. Ted Alexander: (919) 715-0690 Email: Ted.Alexander@ncleg.gov Senator Carl Ford: (919) 733-5665 Email: Carl.Ford@ncleg.gov Senator Amy S. Galey: (919) 301-1446 Email: Amy.Galey@ncleg.gov Senator Brent Jackson: (919) 733-5705 Email: Brent.Jackson@ncleg.gov Senator Todd Johnson: (919) 733-7659 Email: Todd.Johnson@ncleg.gov Senator Bill Rabon: (919) 733-5963 Email: Bill.Rabon@ncleg.gov Senator Benton G. Sawrey: (919) 715-3040 Email: Benton.Sawrey@ncleg.gov Senate Elections Committee https://www.ncleg.gov/Committees/CommitteeInfo/SenateStanding/154 Warren.Daniel@ncleg.gov Ralph.Hise@ncleg.gov Brad.Overcash@ncleg.gov Ted.Alexander@ncleg.gov Carl.Ford@ncleg.gov Amy.Galey@ncleg.gov Brent.Jackson@ncleg.gov Todd.Johnson@ncleg.gov Bill.Rabon@ncleg.gov Benton.Sawrey@ncleg.gov

Action Alert to Senate Rules: H958 Needs to be Fixed! Senate Rules Committee https://www.ncleg.gov/Committees/CommitteeInfo/SenateStanding/148 Chair: Senator Rabon: (919) 733-5963 Email: Bill.Rabon@ncleg.gov Vice Chair: Senator Warren Daniel: (919) 715-7823 Email: Warren.Daniel@ncleg.gov Senator Lisa S. Barnes: (919) 715-3030 Email: Lisa.Barnes@ncleg.gov Senator Danny Earl Brit Jr: (919) 733-5651 Email: Danny.Britt@ncleg.gov Senator Carl Ford: (919) 733-5665 Email: Carl.Ford@ncleg.gov Senator Amy S. Galey: (919) 301-1446 Email: Amy.Galey@ncleg.gov Senator Ralph Hise: (919) 733-3460 Email: Ralph.Hise@ncleg.gov Senator Brent Jackson: (919) 733-5705 Email: Brent.Jackson@ncleg.gov Senator Todd Johnson: (919) 733-7659 Email: Todd.Johnson@ncleg.gov Senator Michael A. Lazzara: (919) 715-3034 Email: Michael.Lazzara@ncleg.gov Senator Michael V. Lee: (919) 715-2525 Email: Michael.Lee@ncleg.gov Senator Tom McInnis: (919) 733-5953 Email: Tom.McInnis@ncleg.gov Senator Norman W. Sanderson: (919) 733-5706 Email: Norman.Sanderson@ncleg.gov Senator Benton G. Sawrey: (919) 715-3040 Email: Benton.Sawrey@ncleg.gov Senator Vickie Sawyer: (919) 715-3038 Email: Vickie.Sawyer@ncleg.gov Senate Rules Committee https://www.ncleg.gov/Committees/CommitteeInfo/SenateStanding/148 Bill.Rabon@ncleg.gov Warren.Daniel@ncleg.gov Lisa.Barnes@ncleg.gov Danny.Britt@ncleg.gov Carl.Ford@ncleg.gov Amy.Galey@ncleg.gov Ralph.Hise@ncleg.gov Brent.Jackson@ncleg.gov Todd.Johnson@ncleg.gov Michael.Lazzara@ncleg.gov Michael.Lee@ncleg.gov Tom.McInnis@ncleg.gov Norman.Sanderson@ncleg.gov Benton.Sawrey@ncleg.gov Vickie.Sawyer@ncleg.gov

View this in your browser Action Alert: RULEMAKING The Administrative Code for elections is just as important as legislation. Many of the rules in the Code need to be revised. Auditor Dave Boliek has opened Rulemaking to public comment. It is imperative that election integrity prevail and our input is heard. Please participate. There are 15 Election Rules in the queue for public comment by 14 July 2026. An in-person public meeting on these 15 rules will be held at 10AM on 29 June in Raleigh. Thus far, the NCEIT team has analyzed and researched Photo ID (2) and Voting Site Rules (4). We will have the remainder of them in the next few weeks. The rules pertain to Absentee Voting (6 rules); Recount Rules (3 Rules). FYI: The NCSBE website for details on commenting and participating in the review process is at this link Rulemaking | NCSBE Please Choose one or more of the Rules below. Please rephrase the Suggestions and its Rationale in your own words so the NCSBE treats each submission separately. Each Rule has a separate entry portal for Public Comment. The directions are on each link for your convenience. Thank you.   Photo ID Required In-Person & Absentee-by-Mail Photo ID In-Person Voting Photo ID Absentee-by-Mail Ballots   Button   Voting Site Rules Voting Site Definitions Buffer Zone Electioneering Zone Conduct at Voting Sites   Button Your Rules Team is far from finished. Absentee Voting and Recount are next. After that, we will draft 'new' Rules. It's been a 'work in progress.' It's fits and starts and lots of re-writes and Zoom calls. Time! Time! Time! These folks are doing a stellar job. You see them, please say, 'Thank You!' :) Joanne Empie, Janet Fenstermaker, Jim Womack, James Meyers, Sidney Reynolds, Debbie Dante, Jay Delancy, Elizabeth Weidner, Deanna De'Liberto and Jane Bilello. NCEIT Jim Womack President, North Carolina Election Integrity Team www.nceit.org 919 774 9682 james.k.womack@gmail.com Board Member: Jane Bilello jane.bilello@gmail.com Board Member: Joanne Empie joanne.empie@gmail.com Board Member: Jay Delancy jay.delancy@gmail.com Board Member: Janet Fenstermaker jmf27614@hotmail.com Board Member: Debbie Dante infernodeb@gmail.com

"...one of the most haphazard and legally indefensible drug-policy actions in modern American history:..." May 29, 2026 Americans Against Legalizing Marijuana (AALM) has received notice of a federal lawsuit challenging one of the most haphazard and legally indefensible drug-policy actions in modern American history: the Biden-Trump Administration’s effort to move marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III under the Controlled Substances Act. The plaintiffs in the lawsuit include a cannabis addiction recovery clinic, two doctors, a cannabis industry victims rights organization and a cannabinoid medical company. The lawsuit claims that Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche’s April 22 order attempts to federally legitimize state "medical" marijuana systems without requiring the scientific scrutiny, FDA approval, medical safeguards, or regulatory accountability demanded of every other federally recognized medicine. According to AALM, the order represents not reform, but political capitulation to a powerful and rapidly expanding marijuana industry whose profits depend on normalizing high-potency THC consumption while minimizing its risks.“This administration is trying to declare marijuana medicine by political decree instead of scientific proof,” said AALM President Carla Lowe. “If this order stands, it will fundamentally corrupt the integrity of the FDA approval process and the Controlled Substances Act itself.” "The lawsuit names President Trump as a defendant because it was his Executive Order that started this arbitrary process" stated David Evans Chief Counsel for the Cannabis Industry Victims Educating Litigators (CIVEL). Federal Government Accused of Creating a Fraudulent Medical System The lawsuit centers on the allegation that the federal government is creating a legally unprecedented “hybrid” drug category that exempts marijuana from standards applied to every other Schedule III controlled substance.Under federal law, Schedule III drugs require: 1. FDA-reviewed safety and efficacy data 2. Physician oversight 3. Controlled prescribing systems 4. Manufacturing controls 5. Pharmacy accountability 6. Labeling and warning requirements 7. Standardized dosing State "Medical" Marijuana satisfies none of those requirements. Yet the Attorney General’s order would permit state medical marijuana products — including raw cannabis flower, ultra-high potency THC concentrates, vape oils, edibles and THC products exceeding 90% potency, to bypass the safeguards imposed on every other federally recognized controlled medicine. This creates a dangerous double standard where political favoritism replaces evidence-based medicine. “Medical Marijuana” Without Medical Standards AALM claims the term “medical marijuana” itself has become politically weaponized and scientifically hollow. Unlike legitimate medicines, state "medical" marijuana marijuana has: No universally accepted dosing guidelines No standardized therapeutic formulations No FDA-approved package inserts No accepted prescribing framework No reliable potency consistency No uniform manufacturing standards State "medical" marijuana programs operate largely through subjective physician “recommendations” rather than actual prescriptions. In most jurisdictions, patients can obtain marijuana approvals with little or no meaningful medical evaluation. AALM argues that these systems bear virtually no resemblance to federally regulated medical frameworks and instead function as commercial retail operations masquerading as healthcare. “Calling something medicine does not make it medicine,” says AALM VP Scott Chipman. “Medicine requires science, standardization, clinical evidence, and accountability. The marijuana industry has spent years bypassing those requirements while demanding the credibility of pharmaceutical legitimacy.” FDA Approval Process Being Circumvented The lawsuit further argues that the Department of Justice is attempting to use United Nations rescheduling powers to circumvent our federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act entirely. While the FDA has approved isolated synthetic THC cannabinoid-based pharmaceuticals it has never approved smoked or raw plant derived marijuana containing THC as safe or effective medicine. According to the complaint, this political shortcut undermines decades of public-health protections and creates a dangerous precedent in which public pressure and industry lobbying override scientific review. Public Health Risks Ignored The lawsuit will also accuse federal officials of not providing physicians with FDA-quality evidence documenting marijuana-related harms, including: Increased risk of psychosis Adolescent neurological impairment Cannabis use disorder and dependency Cognitive decline Cardiovascular complications Prenatal developmental harm Drugged driving fatalities Psychiatric destabilization In addition, the lawsuit will highlight hundreds of known harmful marijuana interactions involving medications such as warfarin, benzodiazepines, antiepileptic drugs, sedatives, statins, corticosteroids, and psychiatric medications. AALM claims that no comprehensive federal physician informational framework exists to safely manage these interactions. “The first obligation of medicine is ‘do no harm,’” added VP Scott Chipman. “This rescheduling effort abandons that principle in favor of politics, ideology, and corporate profit.” Lawsuit Challenges Legality of Order The lawsuit raises multiple legal challenges, including whether the Attorney General: Exceeded statutory authority Violated procedural due process Ignored federal administrative requirements Created an unlawful scheduling category never authorized by Congress Failed to address documented public-health harms Violated international treaty obligations Violated the major questions doctrine by making a decision of enormous economic and political consequence without clear congressional authorization “This case is about far more than marijuana,” stated Evans. "It is about whether science and the rule of law still matter in American drug policy.” Media Contacts:Carla Lowe, President, AALM(916) 708-4111carladlowe@aol.comScott Chipman, Vice President, AALM(619) 990-7480scott@chipman.infoDave Evans, Chief Legal Counsel Cannabis Industry Victims Educating Litigators (CIVEL)(908) 963-0254seniorcounsel@civel.orgPatrick Kenneally, Esq.Connor Mighell, Esq.Burke Law Group(847) 651-8525Dr. Ken Finn, Plaintiff(719) 331-9199 Dr. Libby Stuyt, Plaintiff(719) 671-1611 We appreciate your generous donation! Petition for Review Circuit Court of Appeals District of Columbia New Directions V. Trump https://static1.squarespace.com/static/597f5bd2f7e0ab110dbfb2e5/t/6a19e306b230665694904079/1780081414980/NEW.DIRECTIONS.V.TRUMP+26-1136.pdf Donate

Fight! Fight! Fight! https://youtu.be/kud2iQMc5NQ

https://nevadanewsandviews.com/dead-voters-double-registrations-and-the-law-states-are-ignoring/ Your Voter Rolls Are a Mess. Some States Won't Let Anyone Look. One in eight voter registrations in America is significantly inaccurate. That's not a conspiracy theory. That's a Pew Research finding. And some states are fighting hard to make sure you can't verify it for yourself. A new legal report from the Edwin Meese III Institute for the Rule of Law, written by Heritage Foundation Senior Legal Fellow Hans von Spakovsky, lays out exactly what's going on. It's a story about dirty voter rolls, federal law, and courts that can't agree on something that really shouldn't be this complicated. The Problem Is Bigger Than You Think Between 2013 and 2023, more than 35 million voter registrations were out of date because people had moved, died, or were registered more than once. That's not just sloppy recordkeeping. It's a wide-open door for fraud. A 2020 study compared voter registration lists and voter histories from 42 states. What it found was troubling. There were over 144,000 cases of potentially fraudulent voting during the 2016 and 2018 elections. That included more than 14,000 deceased voters who were recorded as having cast ballots. Over 81,000 people who voted twice at the same address. Nearly 8,400 who voted in two different states. And 34,000 who voted despite being registered at vacant lots, parks, or commercial buildings. Is it any wonder that 43 percent of Americans told Gallup they're not confident in the accuracy and security of our elections? The Law Already Has an Answer Congress saw this coming. The National Voter Registration Act of 1993, known as the NVRA, requires states to keep accurate voter rolls and make those records available for public inspection. Not just for election officials. For anyone. The law is pretty clear. States have to maintain records on their voter list maintenance programs and make them available for public inspection. The goal is transparency. Let citizens and watchdog groups check the work. Groups like the Public Interest Legal Foundation have been doing exactly that. They've asked states for voter roll records. And some states have said no. Where Courts Are Making a Mess Here's where it gets complicated. Federal courts across the country can't agree on who has the right to demand these records in court. The First and Tenth Circuits say yes, watchdog groups have standing to sue when states refuse to hand over voter data. The Ninth Circuit says they have standing but then ruled they can't actually get the voter registration list itself. And the Third, Fifth, and Sixth Circuits say these groups don't have standing at all. That's a genuine legal mess. Your rights under federal law depend entirely on which state you're in. In Michigan, election integrity group PILF tried to get records showing 34,000 deceased voters still on the rolls. Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson refused. The Sixth Circuit sided with Benson. In New Mexico, a group published voter data it legally obtained, and the secretary of state sent a criminal referral to the attorney general. You read that right. A criminal referral for publishing public voter data. What Needs to Happen Von Spakovsky's conclusion is straightforward. The U.S. Supreme Court needs to step in and settle this. The NVRA means what it says. The public has a right to inspect voter rolls. No extra hoops. No proving you “need” the information before you're allowed to have it. Nevada isn't immune to these problems either. Our state has had its own questions about voter roll accuracy and post-election counting processes. When federal law provides a transparency tool, Nevada's citizens should be able to use it. Clean elections start with clean voter rolls. And clean voter rolls start with transparency. The Supreme Court should make sure we can get it. The opinions expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Nevada News & Views. Digital technology was used in the research, writing, and production of this article. Please verify information and consult additional sources as needed. Chuck Muth Mr. Muth is president of Citizen Outreach, founder of CampaignDoctor.com, and publisher of Nevada News & Views. His views are his own. He can be reached at chuck@chuckmuth.com.

Marc Elias and the progressive establishment are spiraling because the Election Integrity Network and Cleta Mitchell dropped the Model Election Laws Handbook, giving states a real blueprint to dismantle the election chaos machine that they have spent years creating and protecting.For years the Left exported the same playbook nationwide: mass mail ballots, loose verification, ballot harvesting, "just trust us" systems. Now conservatives have a playbook of their own, and the same people who manipulated election law from the shadows are suddenly clutching pearls about "democracy." The handbook covers proof of citizenship, voter ID, transparent ballots, clean voter rolls, and chain-of-custody protections.Progressive outlets like Democracy Docket posted scathing reviews of the handbook, exposing how threatened they are by its existence.The loopholes are closing, and the meltdowns prove it. Know the rules. Change the laws. Protect your vote. Read the Guidehttps://www.modelelectionlaws.org/