Search Results
797 results found with an empty search
- Intentional Wrongdoing Is Only Explanation For The Widespread Election Malfeasance On Game Day In AZ
https://www.ashevilleteapac.org/post/intentional-wrongdoing-is-only-explanation-for-the-widespread-election-malfeasance-on-game-day-in-az Kari Lake, the Republican candidate for governor in Arizona, explains to Steve Bannon why she believes her lawsuit against Maricopa County should prevail and the alleged results of the election be overturned. “We filed it on Friday, and it is damning … in detail and evidence in how our elections in Maricopa County were run and here in Arizona. And this is about restoring faith in our elections.” Watch the interview with Kari Lake https://warroom.org/2022/12/12/intentional-wrongdoing-is-only-explanation-for-the-widespread-election-malfeasance-on-game-day-in-az/
- Former WI Justice Michael Gableman Calls Out ERIC and WI Election Fraud at Moment of Truth Summit
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/08/former-wi-justice-michael-gableman-calls-eric-system-wi-election-fraud-moment-truth-summit/ Former WI Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman was contracted by RINO Robin Vos to conduct an in-depth investigation into the 2020 election. In this investigation, he found massive discrepancies in the way the WEC conducted the 2020 election. Justice Gableman called for the legislature in Wisconsin to “take a very hard look at decertification”. Justice Gableman’s first sit down with Mike Lindell can be viewed here. He also later made a more in-depth presentation to the crowd that can be viewed here. Here are some of the highlights on Justice Gableman’s first segment: TRENDING: President Trump Releases One of His Best and Shortest Statements Yet David Becker, founder of ERIC, CEIR (Zuckerberg funded) and the Election Official Legal Defense Network (EOLDN), took George Soros money to fund ERIC Louisiana has removed themselves from ERIC and preserved all 2020 election data Wisconsin Election Commission (WEC) Administrator Meghan Wolfe is also chairman of the board at ERIC. The terms of the contract between ERIC and the State is private Gableman stated “…WEC violated the law in order to conduct a Get Out the Vote campaign for Joe Biden and to defeat Donald Trump…” He also said “ERIC’s stated purpose is to keep our election rolls accurate. That is a lie. Lets just say that…that is a lie. What is my evidence? The evidence is in WI we have approximately 5.5M citizens. Of whom, approximately 4M are eligible to vote. So if I ask you ‘how many people, at most, should WI have on its voter rolls?’ If you’re tracking, you’ll say no more than 4M. That’s the number of eligible voters. We have over 7m names on those voter rolls…The excess of which is all available to the George Soros funded ERIC. And they can do whatever they want with those names and we’re not allowed to know. Neither we nor any other state is allowed to know.” Justice Gableman used an investigation by The Gateway Pundit in his presentation. Here are the links to the four part series by The Gateway Pundit: ERIC Part 1: Who’s “Cleaning” Our Voter Rolls? ERIC Now in 31 States ** ERIC Part 2: Largest U.S. Counties Removed ZERO to TWO Ineligible Voters ** ERIC Part 3: The Founding of the Nation’s Largest Voter Roll Clean-up Operation ** ERIC Part 4: A Response to the Panicked Media Attacks Back in 2021 at the Cyber Symposium, I had the opportunity to meet briefly with Justice Gableman right around the time he was being hired by Robin Vos to conduct this investigation. To say the least, I left highly skeptical of the former WI Supreme Court Justice. I was afraid he was there to simply “kick the can down the road” so to speak. This gut feeling was supported by a brief interaction with Justice Gableman by one of my colleagues. At the event this past weekend, I had the opportunity to walk into the event with Justice Gableman. I spoke with him about that very event and my initial gut feeling. And then I apologized for that view. I don’t know if he was picked for this because Vos believed he would kick the can or not. It’s purely speculative. However, I do believe that if he was hired for that reason, once he got into the nitty gritty of the elections process in Wisconsin, he quickly realized this was far worse than anyone could have ever imagined. And then six months ago, and six months after our initial interaction, he called for the state assembly in WI to look into decertification. He also threw his support behind Adam Steen over RINO Robin Vos. That took guts.
- GOING FORWARD FROM NORTH CAROLINA: THE “BUSINESS” OF FREE AND FAIR ELECTIONS
Cleta Mitchell on whoscounting.us, interviews North Carolina Election Integrity Team Director (NCEIT.org) on the strides made in NC and the path forward to restore confidence in our elections. https://www.cpi.org/2022/12/going-forward-from-north-carolina-the-business-of-free-and-fair-elections/ DECEMBER 8TH, 2022 This interview is part of EIN’s “After and Before” Who’s Counting With Cleta Mitchell Podcast series outlining the positive difference an election integrity infrastructure has in states with active local and state election integrity task forces. After a career spanning 20 years of service in the U.S. Army, West Point graduate Jim Womack entered the private sector as an IT professional as well as becoming a county commissioner and being active in local party politics. These experiences combined to give him the expertise to create a North Carolina fair election organization – the North Carolina Election Integrity Team, called “NCEIT”. Inspired by what he learned at EIN’s first national election integrity leaders’ summit in January of 2022, Jim returned to North Carolina, created NCEIT, collected a team of experts, and spearheaded a statewide election integrity network already making an impact on the election system in his state. Cleta and Jim discuss the importance of applying proven business practices to “the business of election integrity.” Jim’s EI business model is organized into EI issues or “lanes” that are then delineated into tasks and assigned to specific task force members with relevant interest or expertise. NCEIT has also prioritized these EI lanes, and made great strides in becoming deeply involved with voter rolls and list maintenance, voting machine accuracy, creating relationships with election boards and other pertinent issues. Jim and has team have uncovered some critical problems in NC statutes, state election board procedures, and in standard election practices that must be addressed by policymakers and legislators. The work that NCEIT is doing is also helping to inform task forces and election integrity advocates in other states. Be encouraged! Be engaged! The post Going forward from North Carolina: The “Business” of Free and Fair Elections appeared first on Election Integrity Network – Who’s Counting with Cleta Mitchell.
- Rep. Andrew Ogles Reveals What Concessions Were Made in Battle for Speaker of the House
January 6, 2023 Updated: January 7, 2023 News Analysis Although not yet sworn in, first-year Congressman Andrew Ogles from the Tennessee Fifth District found himself in the middle of a historic maelstrom when he arrived in Washington on Dec. 31, 2022, in the company of his family. But Ogles knew a bit of what he was getting into because he had already become a member of the Freedom Caucus and was already involved in the ongoing negotiations that, as of this writing, seem to have vastly reformed the way the U.S. Congress will do business in exchange for allowing Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) to become Speaker. Ogles should be known to many Epoch Times readers for his participation in the unique primary debate—using domain experts instead of journalists to ask the questions—sponsored by this company in concert with the Nashville Republican Women. Little did we know, nor probably did he, that Ogles would end up being one of the 20 to instigate this monumental change they say will return the Congress to the original intention of the Founders as The People’s House. I spoke with Ogles by phone the night of Jan. 6, 2023, before the roll call vote during which, it was said, two of the remaining rejectionists who couldn’t accept McCarthy personally would absent themselves so that the magic number would be lowered and the new Speaker could go over the top. Apropos, Ogles informed me that what many had guessed was true. His absence from voting in a previous round was also planned. He waited to see that all was going according to plan before stepping forward to flip his vote to McCarthy after the initial round. For Ogles, the basis of all the negotiations was to establish the rules of the game in Congress that had been altered over the years beyond recognition. As he pointed out, the rules of a game almost always determine the winner. He shared with me a list of some of what has been roughly negotiated to date. The devil, as always, is in the details. As has been reported, it will only take a single congressperson, acting in what is known as a Jeffersonian Motion, to move to remove the Speaker if he or she goes back on their word or policy agenda. A “Church” style committee will be convened to look into the weaponization of the FBI and other government organizations (presumably the CIA, the subject of the original Church Committee) against the American people. Term limits will be put up for a vote. Bills presented to Congress will be single subject, not omnibus with all the attendant earmarks, and there will be a 72-hour minimum period to read them. The Texas Border Plan will be put before Congress. From The Hill: “The four-pronged plan aims to ‘Complete Physical Border Infrastructure,’ ‘Fix Border Enforcement Policies,’ ‘Enforce our Laws in the Interior’ and ‘Target Cartels & Criminal Organizations.’” COVID mandates will be ended as will all funding for them, including so-called “emergency funding.” Budget bills would stop the endless increases in the debt ceiling and hold the Senate accountable for the same. That’s all Ogles would tell me for now, but there is undoubtedly more in ongoing negotiations that could continue even after the final Speaker vote. No word, from him anyway, on committee assignments or agreements, although there are discussions on positions for Freedom Caucus members. Ogles did acknowledge his own interest in the Financial Services Committee, due to his economic background, or the Judiciary Committee. No word either, so far, of a different kind of Jan. 6 investigation, unless that is intended to be wrapped into the new “Church” Committee. I asked Ogles if there would be bad blood, as many are warning, after these days of heated negotiation. He denied it. The Republican majority, he said, was too small to afford that, and they all knew it. Knowing human nature, I wouldn’t have completely believed him on that one had I not heard the resounding and welcoming applause given for every flipped vote. Many of those who voted for McCarthy were one hundred percent in favor of the changes negotiated by the 20, who may well be rewarded in the history books for their initiative. What has been going on is being referred to as “chaos” by Democrats and the media, including, regrettably, many at Fox News and other supposedly right-leaning outlets. Still, others claim this has been a victory for the “extreme right, imposing their views.” It is anything but. It is and has been for the last few days democracy as it should be practiced, and as it is practiced in many democratic assemblies across the world, just not, lately, in the USA. CORRECTION: A previous version of this article misspelt the word world. The Epoch Times regrets the error. Roger L. Simon Roger L. Simon is an award-winning novelist, Oscar-nominated screenwriter, co-founder of PJMedia, and now, editor-at-large for The Epoch Times. His most recent books are “The GOAT” (fiction) and “I Know Best: How Moral Narcissism Is Destroying Our Republic, If It Hasn’t Already” (nonfiction). He can be found on GETTR and TRUTH Social @rogerlsimon. https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/rep-andrew-ogles-reveals-what-concessions-were-made-in-battle-for-speaker-of-the-house_4968315.html?utm_source=Goodevening&src_src=Goodevening&utm_campaign=gv-2023-01-07&src_cmp=gv-2023-01-07&utm_medium=email&est=L6YLZUsuB2Vp26SBX8sGcLK2bFxOHWh6bmoFHdFEBvgURrKiUzQn2wa51uFMLEIM9gI%3D
- NC Supreme Court Hands Win to GOP on Redistricting, Voter ID.
It has been a 10 year odyssey for NC to have the same or similar voter ID requirements that 35 other states already have. The activist liberal courts have thwarted the will of the state's citizens and their legislature for far too long. Hopefully, justice will finally be served this Spring. https://www.theepochtimes.com/nc-supreme-court-hands-win-to-gop-on-redistricting-voter-id_5033977.html?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=gp The North Carolina Supreme Court handed a victory to the state’s Republican legislators on Feb. 3 by siding with a petition that asked the high court to rehear cases involving election maps and voter identification laws. In a vote along partisan lines, the state’s Supreme Court voted 5–2 to rehear the two cases in March—ones that North Carolina’s Republican legislature had previously lost. Two Republicans running for seats on the North Carolina Supreme Court in the November midterm election beat their Democrat opponents, flipping the composition of the court red for the first time since 2016. The partisan switch of the court revived Republican hopes to revisit the cases. In one of the cases, Holmes v. Moore, the state Supreme Court ruled on Dec. 16, 2022, to strike down a law requiring photo voter identification. The justification for that decision was supposed discrimination against minorities. Justice Trey Allen wrote in an order on Feb. 3 that the criteria for adjudicating the request by GOP legislative leaders for the case to be reheard have been met. In a dissenting opinion, Justice Michael Morgan questioned whether the decision to rehear the case would call into question the court’s impartiality. In the other case, Moore v. Harper (formerly Harper v. Hall), the then Democrat-dominated court ruled on Dec. 16, 2022, to confirm a lower court decision to reject legislators’ version of a congressional election map and the state Senate election map. Justice Allen wrote in a separate order that the court has found sufficient grounds to rehear the case. The redistricting case has since made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court, which has reportedly been considering whether to hand down a decision in the case that could have far-reaching consequences for the authority state courts have to impose limits on how state legislatures set election rules. The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Moore v. Harper on Dec. 7, 2022, but isn’t expected to rule on it for several months. This means that the North Carolina Supreme Court could potentially issue a ruling in the case that reverses the Republican loss before the U.S. Supreme Court has issued its decision. The Feb. 3 rulings by the North Carolina Supreme Court mean that both cases will be reheard on March 14, 2023. More Details In a recent legal filing, Republican lawmakers argued in Moore v. Harper that the North Carolina Supreme Court wrongfully infringed on state lawmakers’ ability to determine boundaries of legislative and congressional districts. The court’s December 2022 ruling said that the state Senate boundaries redrawn previously by Republican legislators were tainted by partisan leanings and must be redrawn. It also ruled to uphold a congressional map drawn by lower court judges but that Republicans opposed. A separate filing by Republican lawmakers argued that the correct legal standard wasn’t applied in a decision that the state Supreme Court upheld on voter ID. “Holmes was wrongly decided based on a predetermined outcome. We now have a chance to right this wrong and deliver on voter ID, which the voters of this state overwhelmingly support,” said Sam Hayes, general counsel for the House speaker, according to Spectrum News 1. For more than a decade, North Carolina Republicans have been seeking to pass a law that would require voters to present photo identification. The state legislature passed voter ID laws in 2013, but they were struck down by a federal court. A similar law adopted in 2018 was struck down by the state Supreme Court in December 2022.
- NC Senate and House Room and Phone Numbers
From Sue Butcher The Senate and House list with room numbers and phone numbers will be printed in quantities to be distributed Senate Phones MM-Senate-TelephoneAndOfficeAssignments (ncleg.gov) Senate Addresses MM-Senate-AlphaHomeBusiness (ncleg.gov) House Phones 72689 (ncleg.gov) House Addresses MM-House-AlphabeticalList (ncleg.gov)
- Deadlines To File Bills in NC House & Senate of the General Assembly
Click the link. Scroll down to the bottom of the page for the NC House 2023 Request & Filing Deadlines https://calendars.ncleg.gov/CalendarDoc/2023/7806/House%20Calendar Click on the link. Scroll down to the bottom of the page for the NC Senate Request & Filing Deadlines https://calendars.ncleg.gov/CalendarDoc/2023/7802/Senate%20Calendar Bills eligible to be filed in 2023 with no deadlines • Redistricting bills for House, Senate, Congress, or local entities. (H&S) • Ratification of amendments to the Constitution of the United States. (H&S) • Adjournment resolutions. (H&S). • Bills introduced on the report of the House Committees on Appropriations, Finance, or Rules. (H only) • Bills proposing amendments to the North Carolina Constitution. (S only) • Statutory changes necessary to implement State constitutional amendments. (S only) • Bills addressing election laws. (S only) • Bills providing for action on gubernatorial nominations or appointments.(S only) • Appointments by the General Assembly. (S only) 2023 Crossover Deadline: Thursday, May 4 • Please refer to Senate Rule 41(b)
- NC General Assembly Bills Filed in January That Need Our Support
1) Senate Bill S49 Parents Bill of Rights Full Bill here: S49-SMBC-1(e1)-v-3 (ncleg.gov) 2) House Bill 10 (Public) Filed Wednesday, January 25, 2023 Summary of Full Bill here: Bill Summaries: H10 (2023-2024 Session) | Legislative Reporting Service (unc.edu) An act to require compliance with immigration detainers and administrative warrants and to require certain reports from local law enforcement. Bill Intro. by D. Hall, B. Jones, Saine, Carson Smith. 3) S16:: Bill Summaries: S16 (2023-2024 Session) | Legislative Reporting Service (unc.edu) Summary Senate Bill 16 (Public) Filed Wednesday, January 25, 2023. An act preserving competition in health care by regulating the consolidation and conveyance of hospitals. Bill intro. by Burgin, Corbin,Mayfield.
- 2023 NC Senate Committee Assignment Listed For Outreach
2023 NC Senate Committee Assignment Listed For Outreach Education/Higher Education Wed. at 11:00 a.m. (544 LOB) Co-Chairman Senator Galey Co-Chairman Senator Lee Members Senators Barnes, Chaudhuri, Corbin, Craven, Garrett, Hanig, Lazzara, Marcus, McInnis, Murdock, B. Newton, Overcash, Robinson, Sanderson, Sawrey, Smith, Waddell Health Care Wed./Thurs. at 10:00 a.m. (544 LOB) Co-Chairman Senator Burgin Co-Chairman Senator Corbin Co-Chairman Senator Krawiec Members Senators Adcock, Barnes, Batch, Britt, Galey, Hise, Jarvis, Mayfield, Mohammed, Perry, Robinson, Sawrey, Woodard Redistricting and Elections Upon Call of the Chair Co-Chairman Senator Daniel Co-Chairman Senator Hise Co-Chairman Senator P. Newton Members Senators Blue, Ford, Galey, Garrett, Jackson, Krawiec, Lowe, Marcus, Mayfield, Mohammed, Perry, Rabon, Sanderson Rules and Operations of the Senate Tues./Thurs. at 9:00 a.m. (1027 LB) Chairman Senator Rabon Vice-Chairman Senator Daniel Members Senators Barnes, Blue, Britt, Chaudhuri, Hise, Jackson, Johnson, Krawiec, Lee, Lowe, Mayfield, McInnis, Mohammed, P. Newton, Perry, Sanderson, Sawyer, Waddell, Woodard State and Local Government Tues. at 12:00 p.m. (423 LOB) Co-Chairman Senator Alexander Co-Chairman Senator Ford Co-Chairman Senator Jarvis Members Senators Adcock, Applewhite, Bode, Corbin, GrafstPaid ein, Hanig, Lazzara, Meyer, Moffitt, Proctor, Robinson, Sawrey, Settle Paid for by Liberty First Grassroots – LFG Legislative Action Days 2023
- 2023 NC House Committee Assignments Listed For Outreach
2023 NC House Committee Assignments Listed For Outreach ELECTION LAW AND CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM: Representative Mills, Chair; Representatives Dahle and Warren, Vice Chairs; Representatives A. Baker, K. Baker, Ball, Biggs, Blackwell, Buansi, Cotham, Davis, Dixon, Faircloth, Harrison, Iler, John, Riddell, Ward, Willingham, Willis, and Zenger. EDUCATION - COMMUNITY COLLEGES: Representative Willis, Chair; Representative Wheatley, Vice Chair; Representatives Adams, Blackwell, Bradford, Brody, G. Brown, Clampitt, Clemmons, Elmore, John, Penny, Prather, Price, Roberson, Sauls, Tyson, and White. EDUCATION- K-12: Representatives Blackwell, Cotham, and Torbett, Chairs; Representatives Brockman, Wheatley, and Willis, Vice Chairs; Representatives Ball, Biggs, Budd, Clemmons, Elmore, Fontenot, Gill, Iler, Johnson, Lambeth, Lofton, Lucas, Morey, Potts, Riddell, Shepard, Sossamon, Strickland, and von Haefen. EDUCATION - UNIVERSITIES: Representatives Hardister and Pickett, Chairs; Representative Hastings, Vice Chair; Representatives Alexander, K. Baker, G. Brown, Buansi, Carney, Crutchfield, Davis, Hawkins, Howard, N. Jackson, Lambeth, Longest, Prather, and Reeder ETHICS: Representatives Sauls and Wray, Chairs; Representative Setzer, Vice Chair; Representatives Carney, Cotham, Dahle, Davis, and Saine FAMILIES, CHILDREN, AND AGING POLICY: Representatives Clampitt and Pierce, Chairs; Representatives K. Baker, Crawford, Greene, Liu, Lowery, Morey, Pyrtle, Reeder, Sasser, and Charles Smith. HEALTH: Representative Potts, Senior Chair; Representatives K. Baker, Lambeth, Paré, Sasser, and White, Chairs; Representatives Cotham and Cunningham, Vice Chairs; Representatives Ball, Belk, Blackwell, Brisson, Brockman, Buansi, Carney, Cervania, Chesser, Crawford, Crutchfield, Dixon, Fontenot, Howard, Humphrey, Liu, Loftis, Lucas, Pierce, Pyrtle, Reeder, Setzer, Shepard, Tyson, Watford, Wheatley, and Wray OVERSIGHT AND REFORM: Representatives Johnson and Warren, Chairs; Representatives Arp, Cervania, Chesser, Cleveland, Cunningham, Dahle, McNeely, Quick, Stevens, Torbett, and Willingham REDISTRICTING: Representative D. Hall, Chair; Representatives Saine and Torbett, Vice Chairs; Representatives Brockman, Carney, Dixon, Fontenot, Hardister, Harrison, Hastings, Hawkins, A. Jones, B. Jones, Lowery, Mills, Reives, Stevens, and Warren. REGULATORY REFORM: Representatives Riddell and Zenger, Chairs; Representatives Ager, A. Baker, Belk, Biggs, Blackwell, Bradford, Brody, T. Brown, Butler, Clampitt, Dahle, Kidwell, Paré, Price, and Stevens. RULES, CALENDAR, AND OPERATIONS OF THE HOUSE: Representative D. Hall, Chair; Representatives Hastings, B. Jones, and Torbett, Vice Chairs; Representatives Bell, Brisson, Carney, Clemmons, Cotham, Cunningham, Dahle, Davis, Dixon, K. Hall, Hardister, N. Jackson, John, Mills, Paré, Quick, Reives, Saine, Tyson, White, Willingham, and Wray. STATE GOVERNMENT: Representative Warren, Chair; Representatives Balkcom, Greene, F. Jackson, Jeffers, Pike, Ross, Charles Smith, Torbett, and Ward. Paid for by Liberty First Grassroots – LFG Legislative Action Days 2023
- Biblical Citizenship Course to Recruit for NCEIT Task Forces
Thank you, Catherine Pawlik, for reminding us of this course! It is a zoom that meets once a week in the evening for 7ish weeks. I'm in week 3 and it is very very good. Besides being a very informative civics refresher, it would also be a good way to recruit more people into Election Integrity activities as it reminds us all about the founding principles of our country and dispels many of the myths being taught today. People can join into an existing class or decide to run one with their own small group. This would be a good program for church groups, youth groups, political clubs, etc. Since most of the materials are videos, it would not be hard for someone to run it within their own church, if they were so inclined. Announcing a Biblical Citizenship Course Consider this- Our Country is a Mess...a Moral-Ethical Mess...a Political Mess...a Financial Mess... a National Security Mess...and yet there is still hope in the midst of these messes. If you are looking for something that YOU can do to make a difference for Liberty… Consider taking this FREE ZOOM course and INVITE YOUR SOCIAL NETWORKS to JOIN YOU. Over 250,000 of your fellow citizens across the United States have equipped themselves through this training in the last few years and each year tens of thousands of additional liberty seekers join them. Education is Empowerment. As John Jay, the First Chief Justice of the Supreme Court said: “Every member of the State ought diligently to read and to study the Constitution of his country, and teach the rising generation to be free. By knowing their rights, they will sooner perceive when they are violated and be the better prepared to defend and assert them.” – John Jay Click the Blue Link below for a MUST WATCH preview video that will inspire you to join for the coursework. Register at the Red Button Below.
- Audit Oversight & Development Resources
Contact Jane.Bilello@gmail.com to request an email forward of the (3) Federal documents. Thanks.








